Tag Archive for: Approach

NATO: Time to Adopt a Pre-emptive Approach to Cyber Security in New Age Security Architecture


Introduction

Cyber threats are complex and asymmetrical, particularly because cyberspace is “borderless” and exists digitally. NATO ensures its cyber security through collective action among its permanent members who respond based on the depth of the attack or vulnerability. With the new NATO Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), a cyber security command based in Mons, Belgium, NATO reinforces its capabilities in the cyber ecosystem. NATO seeks to secure its infrastructural digital networks through a centralized allied process. The main stated strategic goal of NATO’s cyber security infrastructure is to collectively counter “the full spectrum of cyber threats at all times.” The key pillars of this deterrence and defense posture include safeguarding vital networks, protecting infrastructures, and supporting cyber security missions. To mitigate the asymmetrical threat of cyberattacks, NATO must remain technologically advanced, agile, and interoperable in military operations to enhance its collective cyber resilience. NATO’s current policy simply responds to cyber attacks and minimizes vulnerabilities. NATO should transition towards preventing such attacks at all levels (from fundamental to complex wired infrastructure).

The Evolution of NATO’s Posture

As a security provider in the Euro-Atlantic region, NATO must ensure protection at all levels to prevent harm and damage from cyberattacks. NATO has long considered cyber defense to be a central defense mechanism. The need for a cyber security space feasibility requirement was first noted in the 2002 NATO Summit meeting in Prague, which discussed the necessity of technological agility and planning on electronic warfare and information systems. The Riga Summit in 2006 reiterated this necessity. Despite this recognition, no cyber security apparatus fully evolved, and interconnected cyber defense capacity remained low. Nevertheless, the summits accurately forecasted that future war operations would be far more complicated due to growing cyber security threats. Battles have occurred over an increasing number of dimensions–whether air, land, sea, or digital–particularly as electronic warfare has become a…

Source…

Fortifying cyber defenses: A proactive approach to ransomware resilience


Ransomware has become a pervasive threat, compromising the security and functionality of vital systems across the United States.

While governmental pledges and public declarations of intent to fight cybercrime are foundational, they often lack the immediate and tangible impact necessary to counter sophisticated cyber threats. Case in point – the US recently pledged, along with 39 other countries, not to pay ransoms. In theory this makes sense: don’t pay, the bad guys don’t make money and move on to other crimes. In practice, it won’t work.

government cybersecurity tools

Getting the right tools

Instead of investing time in formulating non-binding pledges rather than working on actionable solutions, the US Government should adopt a more proactive stance by directly procuring advanced cybersecurity tools.

These tools, which have been developed to keep data safe and stop ransomware attacks, exist and are continually evolving. By spearheading the implementation, through investment and education, the government can set a powerful example for the private sector to follow, thereby reinforcing the nation’s cyber infrastructure.

The effectiveness of such tools is not hypothetical: they have been tested and proven in various cybersecurity battlegrounds. They range from advanced threat detection systems that use artificial intelligence to identify potential threats before they strike, to automated response solutions that can protect data on infected systems and networks, preventing the lateral spread of ransomware.

Investing in these tools would not only enhance the government’s defensive capabilities but would also stimulate the cybersecurity industry, encouraging innovation and development of even more effective defenses.

This approach can also foster public-private partnerships, as government agencies can collaborate with cutting-edge technology firms to develop new standards, best practices, and adapt commercial tools for government use, ensuring the most robust protection possible. These collaborations can also facilitate expanded information sharing, enabling both to stay ahead of emerging threats and collectively strengthen the nation’s cyber defenses.

Moreover, the procurement of…

Source…

Commentary: Right intention, wrong approach for OCBC and its new anti-scam measure


On the flip side, there’s also the risk of being too stringent. For instance, in their bid to counter fraudulent activities, some banks employ rigorous transaction verification processes that can sometimes decline legitimate transactions.

Rather than just imposing technological restrictions, perhaps a more holistic approach – combining technology with user education – would be more effective. By fostering a user base that is informed about the dangers of third-party downloads and equipped to discern app permissions, the bank can bolster its defenses.

BANKS AND USERS MUST SHARE RESPONSIBILITY

OCBC’s move underscores a broader, industry-wide debate in which banks are walking the tightrope in an era of relentless digital transformation to maintain trust, especially as financial institutions will be expected to share liabilities in scam cases under an upcoming government framework.

The financial sector has thrived on customer trust. Security measures they implement, while ensuring safety, must not compromise this integral relationship.

It’s a complex interplay of trust, security, and convenience. It’s not just about stopping potential threats but also about ensuring that in doing so, the banks do not alienate their customers.

Banks need to understand that in the age of digitisation, customer expectations are evolving. They desire a mix of security, which protects them, and autonomy, which doesn’t make them feel surveilled or restricted. The challenge here lies in combining the two.

OCBC’s decision, while well-intentioned, highlights the intrinsic challenge digital banks face between ensuring a harmonious user experience and robust security. This measure might come off as overbearing to some, yet it underscores an immutable fact – in the realm of digital banking, both the institution and its users bear the responsibility of safeguarding against cyber threats.

The task of ensuring robust security isn’t solely the bank’s prerogative; users too need to be vigilant and well-informed.

Dr Jonathan Chang is CEO of Fintopia Indonesia – a digital lending fintech unicorn. He is also a lecturer, public policy advisor and an award-winning researcher.

Source…

A Comprehensive Approach to Malware Detection and Prevention


Exploring India’s NAMA Solutions: A Comprehensive Approach to Malware Detection and Prevention

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the threat of malware has become increasingly prevalent, necessitating robust and comprehensive solutions for detection and prevention. India, a global leader in information technology, has risen to the challenge with the development of NAMA Solutions, a comprehensive approach to malware detection and prevention.

NAMA Solutions, an innovative cybersecurity initiative, is a testament to India’s commitment to safeguarding its digital infrastructure. This initiative is designed to detect and prevent malware attacks, which have become a significant concern for businesses and individuals alike. The rise of sophisticated cyber threats has underscored the need for a comprehensive approach that not only detects malware but also prevents it from causing damage.

NAMA Solutions leverages advanced technologies and methodologies to provide a multi-layered defense against malware. It employs machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence to identify potential threats, analyze their behavior, and neutralize them before they can inflict harm. This proactive approach is a significant departure from traditional reactive methods, which often fail to prevent damage.

The strength of NAMA Solutions lies in its ability to adapt to the ever-changing cyber threat landscape. It continually learns from new threats and adjusts its defense mechanisms accordingly. This dynamic approach ensures that the system remains effective even as cyber threats evolve and become more sophisticated.

Moreover, NAMA Solutions is not just about technology; it also emphasizes the importance of human involvement in cybersecurity. It promotes cybersecurity awareness and education, recognizing that informed users are the first line of defense against cyber threats. By empowering users with knowledge and tools, NAMA Solutions enhances the overall security posture of organizations and individuals.

The implementation of NAMA Solutions has had a significant impact on India’s cybersecurity landscape. It has reduced the incidence of malware attacks and minimized the damage caused by…

Source…