Tag Archive for: requirements

CISSP Certification Exam Cost And Requirements – Forbes Advisor

/in


Editorial Note: We earn a commission from partner links on Forbes Advisor. Commissions do not affect our editors’ opinions or evaluations.

The Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) credential demonstrates mastery of developing and overseeing large-scale cybersecurity programs. When it comes to the best cybersecurity certifications, many consider CISSP the industry’s gold standard. Individuals who meet CISSP requirements can earn the certification and qualify to take on more professional responsibility in their field.

This guide offers information on CISSP certification requirements, including experience, suggested preparation times and CISSP certification exam costs.

What Is CISSP Certification?

CISSP certification, offered by (ISC)2, is an advanced credential for information systems and cybersecurity professionals. This certification highlights an individual’s ability to create, deploy and manage cybersecurity efforts for large organizations.

CISSP certification requirements include a significant amount of professional experience and passing a lengthy exam. This credential suits experienced workers over entry-level and mid-level professionals.

Though this certification is not required by employers, it can boost candidates’ earning power and help them qualify for advanced roles in information security. CISSPs often work in positions like chief information security officer (CISO), network architect, security auditor and security manager, among others.

CISSP Certification Requirements

Aspiring CISSPs should familiarize themselves with the certification’s requirements before pursuing this credential.

Gain Experience

CISSP certification requirements stipulate that each candidate must have a minimum of five years of relevant professional experience. (ISC)² specifies eight security domains:

  • Domain 1: Security and Risk Management
  • Domain 2: Asset Security
  • Domain 3: Security Architecture and Engineering
  • Domain 4: Communication and Network Security
  • Domain 5: Identity and Access Management (IAM)
  • Domain 6: Security Assessment and Testing
  • Domain 7: Security Operations
  • Domain 8: Software Development Security

Prospective…

Source…

Final Rule Places New Cybersecurity Reporting Requirements On Banks – Finance and Banking

/in



United States:

Final Rule Places New Cybersecurity Reporting Requirements On Banks

09 March 2022


Crowe & Dunlevy



To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last month, the Federal Reserve System’s Board of Governors,
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency approved a final rule that places
reporting requirements on banks and banking service providers.
Under this new rule, banks must report cybersecurity incidents
within 36 hours to federal regulators. In addition, banking service
providers must notify banks as soon as possible after suffering a
computer security incident. This new rule also requires banks to
inform customers of any computer security incident lasting more
than four hours.

This new rule is part of a current trend of requiring critical
infrastructures to report cybersecurity incidents. This rule goes
into effect starting April 1, 2022, and banks are required to be in
compliance by May 1, 2022. While the rule doesn’t go into
effect until next year, there are several ways that banks and
service providers can get prepared.

  1. Determine who will be responsible for reporting the
    incident to the regulators.     Cybersecurity incidents are
    stressful. While the rule provides a more extended deadline than
    the 12-hour reporting requirement for pipelines, 36 hours is still
    a quick turnaround. Taking the time now to identify the person
    responsible will…

Source…

Cybersecurity: Preliminary Results Show That Agencies’ Implementation of FISMA Requirements Was Inconsistent

/in


What GAO Found

Based on GAO’s preliminary results, in fiscal year 2020, the effectiveness of federal agencies’ implementation of requirements set by the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA) varied. For example, more agencies reported meeting goals related to capabilities for the detection and prevention of cybersecurity incidents, as well as those related to access management for users. However, inspectors general (IG) identified uneven implementation of cyber security policies and practices. For fiscal year 2020 reporting, IGs determined that seven of the 23 civilian Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (CFO) agencies had effective agency-wide information security programs. The results from the IG reports for fiscal year 2017 to fiscal year 2020 were similar with a slight increase in effective programs for 2020.

Number of 23 Civilian Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 Agencies with Effective and Not Effective Agency-Wide Information Security Programs, as Reported by Inspectors General for Fiscal Years 2017-2020

Number of 23 Civilian i Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990

GAO has also routinely reported on agencies’ inconsistent implementation of federal cybersecurity policies and practices. Since 2010, GAO has made about 3,700 recommendations to agencies aimed at remedying cybersecurity shortcomings; about 900 were not yet fully implemented as of November 2021. More recent GAO reviews have identified weaknesses regarding access controls, configuration management, and the protection of data shared with external entities. GAO has made numerous recommendations to address these.

Based on interviews with agency officials, such as chief information security officers, GAO’s preliminary results show that officials at 14 CFO Act agencies stated that FISMA enabled their agencies to improve information security program effectiveness to a great extent. Officials at the remaining 10 CFO Act agencies said that FISMA had improved their programs to a moderate extent. The officials also identified impediments to implementing FISMA, such as a lack of resources. Agency officials suggested ways to improve the FISMA reporting process, such as by updating FISMA metrics to increase their effectiveness, improving…

Source…

Bank Computer Security Incident Notification Requirements

/in


Thursday, December 16, 2021

The three prudential bank regulators published Final Rules for Computer-Security Incident Notification Requirements (Final Rules) on November 23, 2021. The purpose of the Final Rules is to promote timely notification of computer-security incidents that materially and adversely affect an insured depository institution. The new rules apply to insured depository institutions and to bank service company providers performing covered services for financial institutions. The Final Rules take effect on April 1, 2022, with full compliance extended to May 1, 2022. 

Notification required under the Final Rules must be made by an insured depository institution to its primary federal banking regulator as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after the banking organization determines that a notification incident has occurred. Notification must be made by a bank service provider to each affected banking organization as soon as possible when the bank service provider determines it has experienced a computer breach incident that has materially disrupted or degraded the covered service for more than four hours.

Key to the duties to report are the definitions of two terms: “computer security incident” and “notification incident.” A computer-security incident is an occurrence that results in actual harm to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an information system or information that the system processes, stores, or transmits. A notification incident is a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, a banking organization’s (i) ability to carry out banking operations, activities, or processes or to deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, in the ordinary course of business; (ii) business lines, including associated operations, services, functions, and support that, upon failure, would result in a material loss of revenue, profit, or franchise value; or (iii) operations, including associated services, functions, and support, as…

Source…